Thursday, May 25, 2006

 

Be Scared, Very Scared of Our Money Hungry Medical Community... Because They Are Killing Us!

This is my real passion regarding HCV. I went to Capital Hill a couple of years ago with a HCV group. I presented members of both houses with a report on this. None of them had been aware of this. I continue to apply pressure on the NY elected officials that I know and won't stop until they do.

I had stumbled upon this information by trying to find out how I had contracted HCV. My first doc had told me that I either contracted it from IV drugs or a blood transfusion which did not apply to me.. He gave me an evil smirk and said, well, that's the only way you could have gotten HCV. As fate would have it, my first Dr. from hell who's name is Dr. Rovito while performing endoscopies and colonoscopies had a wonderful Anesthesiologist who infected 19 patients with HCV by reusing IV needles.

A close friend that I grew up with, was one of them, who received a letter from the NYC health Dept, stating she needed to be tested for HIV & HCV. She had stomach cancer at the time; had surgery and chemo when she was done with that she was diagnosed with breast cancer. After treating that she found out she had HCV, gee isn't the medical filed thoughtful to give 42 patients such a lovely gift as HCV. At the present time does not feel emotionally physically
up to doing treatment.

Surgical saw blade, drill, stapler, scissors and forceps were all sold in packages clearly labeled as single-use devices. That means the manufacturer designed the device as a throwaway. Use on one patient, and then discard. So are the surgical gowns, elastic bandage, the catheter used for balloon angioplasty, the mask used for anesthesia, and plenty of other common medical equipment used in hospitals and doctors' offices.

How many times has that "non-reusable" medical device actually been reused? Is a balloon angioplasty catheter, used to treat blockages in coronary arteries, just as flexible, safe and effective the second time around? Or the third?

Does your kid care if those metal braces had a previous home in a mouth or two before they were glued to her teeth? After all, everything has been carefully sterilized. But will the metal in those used braces be more likely to break in the middle of a vacation or another inconvenient time?

Patients should be asking those questions because disposable medical devices are reused all the time. In addition, nobody knows how well devices made for one use stand up to repeated use. The practice of reprocessed and reusing "single-use devices" has become common during the last few years. The 2000 congressional study concluded that at least one-third of American hospitals reuse some disposable medical devices. Experts believe the trend is growing.

Cost-cutting efforts are one factor. A hospital or clinic can save money by reusing disposable medical devices. Sales of these devices totaled $56 billion in 1999. Use a disposable umbilical scissors to cut the cord on one newborn baby, for instance, and pay full price. Use it on two newborns, and the hospital's costs drop by 50 percent.

Advances in plastics and other materials used to make the 80,000 to 100,000 different kinds and brands of medical devices are another factor. Single-use devices are made from sturdier materials, and it seems reasonable that such material can be reprocessed and safely reused. However, few studies have been done to verify that belief. In order to get U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval to sell a single-use device, manufacturers must prove only that it is safe and effective for one use.

Manufacturers need not do studies proving that the device can be reprocessed and used multiple times just as safely and effectively as the first.
reprocessed usually means that the device is carefully cleaned, inspected, refurbished and sterilized before use on the next patient. Some hospitals reprocessed single-use devices themselves. Others send used devices to companies that reprocessed them. Cleaning and sterilizing medical devices made for one-time use may be more difficult than sterilizing devices manufactured for multiple use, according to the FDA.

FDA studies identified several theoretical problems with reused medical devices. These include possible increased risk of infection if devices are not properly sterilized before reuse, possible increased risk of failure in orthodontic products, possible loss of elasticity and durability in balloon catheter devices and possible loss of original lubricants. Studies, however, find little evidence of widespread health problems from recycling single-use devices. Only 245 "adverse events" were linked to reuse of such devices during the last three years of the 1990s, according to the FDA. Manufacturers reported seven patient deaths, 72 injuries and 147 device malfunctions. I think these numbers are bullshit, how does one know when they went for a flu years ago, that needle wasn't reused, or went to a dentist, or had a medical procedure. These numbers are the ones that were caught!

The FDA decided on stricter regulation and monitoring of single-use-device reprocessed by third-party companies and hospitals. It hinted that more regulation may be on the horizon. Patients may want to talk with their doctors about recycled medical devices before undergoing procedures and ask, too, whether such devices could have been a factor if a procedure goes bad.


Some Commonly Reprocessed Single-Use Devices
Surgical saw blade
Surgical drill
Surgical stapler
Laparoscopy scissors
Orthodontic (metal) braces
Electrophysiology catheter
Electrosurgical electrodes and pencils
Endotracheal tube
Balloon angioplasty catheter
Biopsy forceps
Umbilical scissors
Gas mask
Ophthalmic knife
Irrigating syringe
Surgical gown
needles

Comments:
I am utterly appauled that in this day and age, with all that we know about communicable desease and never mind the fact that we are charged somewhere in the neighborhood of 5 dollars for a tylenol in the hospital, that the medical community would reuse such equiptment. I am going to write a letter to my local government officials regarding this issue.
you must be a really remarkable woman to know these things
 
Hi A,

Thank you for taking the time to make a comment. I appreciate it. Oh, I wouldn't say I am remarkable, perhaps wonderful, lol.

When my doc, said he had some bad news for me and that I have my husband present. I was scared to death. I thought I was going to be told I had cancer. He said you have Hep C, I said oh great's, and not so bad. Now how long do I need best rest?

I had no clue to this horrid disease nor did I know how much damage it can cause. At that time, I didn't have a computer or know anyone that had HCV. I did know that I had to own the disease and not simply rely on my dr. I contacted the Liver Foundation and Shering Plough's "be in Charge" Program to get some information on it.

As soon as I got a computer I starting doing research. I do not know how I was infected because I was told by my idiot first dr. that there were only 2 ways of getting it. Blood transfusions or IV drug use.

However, I have since learned since I live on this planet and have had manicures, pedicures, ear piercings, been in hospitals, had dental work, etc. It is almost impossible to know how, where or by whom I was infected.

Besides contacting your local govt, if you live in the USA, you need to write the FDA. I have, and trust me, they skirt around the issue by stating it's hard to monitor.

Nice to meet you...
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?